Range Test Comparison between WLR089U module and SAMR34 chip-down XPRO


A range test in wireless communications generally refers to the distance covered by a wireless link between a transmitter and a receiver, with acceptable packet loss and without breaking the link. The higher the operating frequency the lower the range will be, as high-frequency signals are more attenuated by free space than low-frequency signals are (e.g.: 2.4 GHz signals are attenuated more than Sub-1 GHz signals). So, if two signals (2.4 GHz and Sub-1 GHz) of the same Tx power are transmitted, the Sub-1 GHz signal (915 MHz or 868 MHz) will reach a longer distance than the 2.4 GHz signal. There is another factor that affects the range: antenna size. High-frequency signals (2.4 GHz) need a smaller antenna than lower frequency signals (915 MHz) as the antenna size (e.g.: λ/4 for monopole antenna) is directly proportional to the wavelength of a signal and the wavelength is inversely proportional to the operating frequency. λ/4 is the required length for a monopole antenna to achieve long-range. If a λ/10 size antenna is used for that application, the range will be reduced.

Next, the range of the same Tx & Rx differs based on the test environments (free space, office, industry, hospital, etc.) as there will be different obstacles that affect the signal strength by reflection, diffraction, and scattering; the range will be different for different environments. Here, we focused on two methods of measurements. The first one is based on a conducted test setup using cables and attenuators in between Tx & Rx DUTs placed within GTEM Cells. The communication link between the GTEM cell’s input port and DUT is radiated. The second one has been measured in an open area in a suburban environment, which is one of the real use cases.

Link budget measurement by GTEM cell

Test Setup

GTEM cells are used for link budget measurement including Antenna Gains (Tx & Rx)


RF Path Loss Description

  • TEM Cell Path Loss (TCPL): 868 MHz: ~18 dB, 915 MHz:~19 dB
  • Insertion loss of the variable attenuator (IL_VA): ~6 dB
  • Total Coaxial Cable Loss (CL): ~2 dB
  • Link budget = 2* TCPL + IL_VA+ the attenuation of the variable attenuator + CL + 30 dB
  • 868 MHz Link budget = 74 dB + the attenuation of the variable attenuator
  • 915 MHz Link budget = 76 dB + the attenuation of the variable attenuator

WLR089U and SAMR34 XPRO Settings

  • Power level: 15 @868 MHz, 20 @915 MHz
  • Spread factor: SF12
  • LoRA bandwidth: 125 kHz
  • No. of packets: 100
  • 1% Packet error rate
915 MHz 868 MHz
WLR089 XPro 155 dB 152 dB
SAMR34 XPro 156 dB 152 dB

Both WLR089 XPro and SAMR34 Xplained Pro have similar performance in the Link Budget measurement


Friis equation in decibel form:
$P_{R}$ (dB) $= -20 log ({4\pi \over \lambda}) - 10 n log(d) + G_{T} + G_{R} + P_{T}$
Link budget = $20 log ({4\pi \over \lambda}) + 10 n log(d) + F_{\rm m}$

$F_{\rm m} =$ Fading margin, at least 15 dB
$d = distance$ (in m), $n = 2.5$ for open field
For 915 MHz and 868 MHz, $20 log ({4\pi \over \lambda})$ = ~32 dB

Calculated range from the link-budget

Fm = 15 dB 915 MHz 868 MHz
WLR089 XPro 20.9 km 15.8 km
SAMR34 XPro 22.9 km 15.8 km
  1. Note that the calculated range from the link-budget is ideal, 1 dB difference in the link budget would not have a significant difference in the actual range. Thus, the performance of the WLR089U and SAMR34 XPro is similar.
  2. The UFL antenna used with the WLR089 XPro has a ~15 cm UFL cable, which introduces additional loss when compared to the SAMR34 XPro using an SMA antenna. So, it is expected for the WLR089U to have a slightly lower link budget.

Better Range Projection by Real Range Measurement at 1.5 km

1.5 km RSSI test :

Read the average RSSI value in RX at a distance of 1.5 km from TX. Next, calculate the sensitivity margin to estimate the range.
DUT is placed at a height of 1.5 m from the ground

  • The sensitivity with SF12 for 915 MHz and 868 MHz is -136 dBm.
  • The average RSSI reading for both WLR089U and SAMR34 XPro is ~ -103 dBm at 915 MHz and ~ -105 dBm at 868 MHz.
  • The sensitivity margin is 33 dB at 915 MHz and 31 dB at 868 MHz.
  • sensitivity margin = $10 n log ({d \over 1500})$, where n = 2.8 for suburban environment
  • The range for 915 MHz is ~ 22.7 km and 868MHz is ~ 18.9 km.

This is an extrapolated range estimation based on the measured RSSI value at 1.5 km, actual full range will vary based on the test environments.

Recommended Range Test Setup

It is suggested to test in an open area with fewer to no obstacles between Tx and Rx.


Tested Samples


Antenna Used in the Measurement

Used antenna in WLR089U:

Used antenna in SAMR34 XPro:


Range calculation application note

© 2020 Microchip Technology, Inc.
Notice: ARM and Cortex are the registered trademarks of ARM Limited in the EU and other countries.
Information contained on this site regarding device applications and the like is provided only for your convenience and may be superseded by updates. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application meets with your specifications. MICROCHIP MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WRITTEN OR ORAL, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, RELATED TO THE INFORMATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ITS CONDITION, QUALITY, PERFORMANCE, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PURPOSE. Microchip disclaims all liability arising from this information and its use. Use of Microchip devices in life support and/or safety applications is entirely at the buyer's risk, and the buyer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Microchip from any and all damages, claims, suits, or expenses resulting from such use. No licenses are conveyed, implicitly or otherwise, under any Microchip intellectual property rights.